To consider a report by the Fund Administrator on the progress to date on the Brunel Pensions Partnership (attached).
Minutes:
The Committee considered a report by the Fund Administrator on the progress to
date in implementing the Full Business Case (FBC) for the Brunel Pension
Partnership (BPP), as approved by the Committee at its meeting on 9 January 2017.
He informed members that Dorset County Council, as administering authority,
had approved the processes to establish the company and implement the new
governance arrangements.
The Fund Administrator believed this was the largest ever change to the
management arrangements of the Fund, and a huge amount of work had been
completed to date and was still needed to implement the changes successfully. He
informed members that there were monthly meetings of the Shadow Oversight Board
(SOB), attended by representatives of all ten pension fund committees or equivalent
and chaired by the Dorset Fund Chairman, regular meetings of the chief financial and
legal officers for each fund, the Finance and Legal Assurance Group (FLAG), and the
investment officers of each fund, the Client Operating Group (COG) were held.
The Fund Administrator informed members that Denise La Gal had been
appointed as chair of Brunel Pension Partnership Ltd. The Chairman told members
that the three Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) had also been appointed – Steve
Tyson (the shareholder representative NED), Mike Clark and Frederique
Pierre-Pierre. The Fund Administrator confirmed that the recruitment process for the
executive posts had begun, and that Dawn Turner, Environment Agency, had been
appointed Interim Managing Director. He added that there had been significant
discussions at SOB and FLAG on reward packages, with salaries capped and no
bonuses for executives.
Members were informed members that officers were close to finalising the evaluation
of the responses to the Invitation to Tender (ITT) to appoint an administrator and
custodian for BPP Ltd and the underlying funds.
It was noted that from July 2017 the Shadow Oversight Board (SOB) would become
the Oversight Board (OB). The Chairman was mindful not to overburden members
with too much detail on project progress but asked that members continued to raise
any queries or concerns with him, as the Fund’s representative. He added
that SOB had provided a high level of scrutiny and challenge on all matters,
particularly future governance arrangements and cost control. He felt that the
funds had worked well together, with decisions reached so far by consensus not
majority, including some very difficult issues. He also highlighted the comprehensive
legal and financial advice and support provided to the project by Osborne Clarke and
PwC respectively.
A member asked about the management of transition costs. The Chairman
replied that to date there had been set-up and development costs, but as yet no
transition costs. Once officers had been recruited to BPP Ltd detailed plans for
transition would be developed and implemented, with cost control a major factor.
The Fund Administrator noted that transition costs would also be an important consideration in implementing any changes to the strategic allocation in advance of BPP.
The Vice-Chairman said that it would be useful to receive a regular, short and
specific report, highlighting key risks and measuring performance against Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs). The Chairman asked that officers request a forward
plan be produced by BPP Ltd, and a member asked if the Committee could be
informed of any significant developments between meetings. The Fund
Administrator agreed with these requests and explained that the Services Agreement
between each fund and BPP Ltd included the requirement for KPIs to be agreed and
monitored, and it was expected these would be agreed later in the year.
Noted
Supporting documents: